Registration Readiness Scorecard
Approximately two pages across six dimensions, with red/amber/green ratings and one priority action per dimension.
Free
See the intake and scope →For small NDIS and aged-care providers
If 1 October is on your calendar, start with the facts.
1 July 2026 starts the mandatory-registration rollout; new SIL/platform providers need registration, while existing unregistered SIL providers have a transition and must apply by 1 October 2026 to continue. Clearharbour turns a frightening deadline into a scoped next step.
Source route: NDIS 30 June 2026 release and NDIS Commission Reform pathway. Accessed 12 August 2026 in the local due-diligence file.
Bounded speed48-hour scorecard after complete intake
Source-linkedClaims carry source and scope notes
Fixed-price workScope, dependencies and exclusions visible
Reviewed before releaseDefined review gates on every deliverable
Choose the next useful step
Compliance work that stays close to the real operating week.
Start small when the facts are unclear. Move to a fixed project when the scope is defined. Keep an owner when the work needs a cadence. Triage a finding when it has already landed.
Registration Sprint
A configured policy suite, self-assessment, evidence pack, interview preparation and two remediation rounds for one agreed scope.
$6,500-$18,500 ex GST
Read the fixed pathways →Compliance Partner Retainer
A monthly cycle for policy currency, registers, evidence, quarterly mock audit and annual internal gap review.
$890-$2,590 / month ex GST
See the recurring cycle →Audit Rescue
Free 48-hour triage, then a fixed scope for root-cause analysis, corrective-action planning and evidence response support.
$9,500-$28,000 ex GST
Read the rescue boundary →When the folder is full
The question is usually not “Can I find a policy?”
It is “Which scope applies to us, what evidence is missing, who owns the next action, and what can we honestly say about it?” Small providers often carry this role alongside rosters, incidents, workers and clients.
- Missing information is recorded as a limitation, not filled with an assumption.
- A document is not presented as proof that a control is operating.
- The provider remains responsible for implementation, truthful records and submissions.
- The auditor and relevant authority keep their own independent decision.
The service boundaries are set out in the four offer specifications and the local claims-discipline rules.
The operating difference
Current work is more than an updated document.
Start with scope
Entity, supports, modules, sites, worker picture, evidence owners and dates are visible before production.
Compare the source
Claims are compared against the named source, mapped to the agreed scope and flagged where a review date is stale.
Review the conclusion
Review gates are applied to match the risk carried by the claim before anything is released.
Return the next action
Client-owned implementation, evidence and decisions are named instead of hidden behind a polished folder.
Aged-care scope
Category-specific, not one-size-fits-all.
For Support at Home work, the local regulatory canon is specific: providers receiving Support at Home funding must be registered in Category 4 with the service type “care management”. Categories 4, 5 and 6 are not interchangeable home-care labels; Clearharbour scopes the relevant category, evidence and renewal context.
Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission sector snapshot | About provider registration. Accessed 12 August 2026 in the local due-diligence file.
Not sure which route is appropriate?
Use the free scorecard for a six-dimension starting view. If you already have a notice or finding, send that through the secure route and ask about Audit Rescue triage.